Skip to main content
We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here.

Australia Regulator Places Restrictions on Ivermectin as COVID-19 Treatment. Are Hospitals Treating Vaccinated Only With the Drug?


5,100 views

Australia’s fascist regime continues to wage war against its citizens.

The government’s latest assault includes denial of safe, effective COVID-19 treatments.

Similar to the United States, there’s a censorship campaign against Ivermectin in Australia.

Mainstream media refers to Ivermectin as “horse dewormer,” but it’s promising results against COVID-19 are undeniable.

Countries that prescribe Ivermectin, such as India, Indonesia, and Slovakia, have fared much better than those who censor the drug.

Despite the growing evidence of Ivermectin’s effectiveness against COVID-19, Australia’s medicine and therapeutics regulator placed new restrictions on prescribing it for COVID-19.

Doctors may only prescribe Ivermectin for approved reasons.

And COVID-19 isn’t one of them.

Here’s the latest:

The Epoch Times had the scoop:

Australia’s medicine and therapeutics regulator, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), has introduced new restrictions on the prescribing of ivermectin for COVID-19 and other off-label use.

The TGA, an agency under Australia’s Department of Health, announced that the changes were introduced “because of concerns with the prescribing of oral ivermectin for the claimed prevention or treatment of COVID-19.”

The new restrictions mean that general practitioners may only prescribe the drug for TGA-approved conditions and not for other non-approved purposes—also referred to as “off-label” use. No penalties were specified in the TGA announcement in the event of a GP skirting the rules.

The Epoch Times has reached out to the TGA for further information.

Only certain specialists can continue to prescribe oral ivermectin for off-label use. They include infectious disease physicians, dermatologists, gastroenterologists, and hepatologists, the TGA announced.

Stromectol ivermectin 3mg is the only oral ivermectin product that is TGA-approved. The indications approved are river blindness, threadworm of the intestines, and scabies.

Ivermectin is not TGA-approved for use to treat COVID-19 in Australia. The TGA said that its use for COVID-19 in the general public is “currently strongly discouraged” by three entities—the National COVID Clinical Evidence Taskforce (pdf), the World Health Organization, and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

TGA Lays Out Concerns

The TGA in its announcement asserted that there are “a number of significant public health risks associated with taking ivermectin in an attempt to prevent COVID-19 infection rather than getting vaccinated.”

The agency added that people who think they are protected from COVID-19 by taking ivermectin “may choose not to get tested or to seek medical care if they experience symptoms,” and claimed that doing so “has the potential to spread the risk of COVID-19 infection throughout the community.”

The TGA said that a second concern involves “unreliable social media posts and other sources” that have reportedly advocated for the use of ivermectin in “significantly higher” doses compared to what is approved and found safe for the treatment of scabies or parasites.

But here’s where things really get sinister.

While reports remain unconfirmed, there’s reason to believe Australian hospitals are using Ivermectin as treatment for only vaccinated COVID-19 patients.

Unvaccinated COVID-19 patients get placed on ventilators.

And we know the results of using those.

Here’s more:

https://twitter.com/InterBang/status/1436952118204772352

SIGN THE PETITION: Release The Epstein Client List!

If these reports are confirmed, the hospitals should be charged with crimes against humanity.

Vaccinated receive effective treatments banned from public use outside the hospital.

Unvaccinated get denied effective treatments and go on the ventilator.

Again, I’ll stress that reports remain unconfirmed.

But this would qualify as pre-meditated murder to push a wicked agenda of demonizing unvaccinated individuals.

Stay tuned for further coverage.



 

Join the conversation!

Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!

Hey, Noah here!

Wondering where we went?

Read this and bookmark our new site!

See you over there!

Thanks for sharing!