Skip to main content
We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here.

UNREAL: Journalist Tweets Porn Should Be Made For Children


5,075 views

When there’s a threat to children, society should band together to protect them at all costs.

Last week, so-called journalist Flora Gill posted one of the most revolting tweets ever on the platform.

If you missed it, this short video sums it up:

Yes, you read that correctly.

Gill suggested making porn for children.

And a follow-up tweet ensured what ages she meant in her original tweet:

After getting destroyed by Twitter, Gill deleted her tweets and attempted to weasel her way out of condemnation.

But Twitter wasn’t having it.

Here are some of the posts:

https://twitter.com/WayneDupreeShow/status/1420823871326986242

Unsurprisingly, Gill has links to the elites of society (like most of these creeps).

Gill is the daughter of Amber Rudd, a former British politician who served as Home Secretary and was a Member of Parliament for the Conservative Party.

https://twitter.com/SabriSun_Miller/status/1420743345073115148

https://twitter.com/amysayswtf/status/1420875305053573124

https://twitter.com/charlie48732111/status/1420843400597839883

mrcTV reported:

Twitter blue-checkmarked Flora Gill (who, according to her bio, has written for GQ, goes by she/her pronouns, and has written pieces like “I Admit It, I Hate Men,” just so you know what we’re dealing with here) apparently lost whatever had originally passed for her brain and openly suggested for all to see:

“Someone needs to create porn for children.”

Yep. And she wasn’t done.

“Hear me out,” Gill continued, determined to dig her hole of shame even deeper.

“Young teens are already watching porn but they’re finding hard core, aggressive videos that give a terrible view of sex. They need entry level porn! A soft core site where everyone asks for consent and no one gets choked etc.”

Uh….yeah. Because the level of kink is the real problem when it comes to teaching young people about having healthy sex lives – you know, ones that might involve something more than anatomy and temporary lust.

NATIONAL POLL: Do You Still Have Trump's Back 100%?

So now this premise, as I understand it, is that because teens are easily exposed to nasty explicit videos on the interwebs, rather than try and teach them some form of basic morality and establish better habits than sitting around viewing violent, hardcore porn, Gill’s solution is to ease them into the world of cheap meaningless sex between strangers by making direct-to-kid videos where yeah, sure, everyone gets naked and romps around in a crude mockery of a sacred intimate act, but they have to sign a waiver first and nobody has to wear a ball gag. That’ll teach them basic respect and a healthy lifestyle!

And lest you think perhaps Gill meant 18-to-20-somethings when she says “children” (which wouldn’t be much better, but hey), think again. In a follow-up tweet to her already dreadful first one, Gill confirmed that she did, in fact, mean “children,” tweeting: “To clarify – children means under 18. I’m talking about 14/15/16 year olds.”

Yikes.

Of course, it didn’t take long for the rest of Twitter, even being the cesspool that it is, to jump on Gill’s hot take and tear it apart for being just as awful as it sounds – so much so that the journo deleted both tweets and instead tried to shift the blame to those sharing screenshots of her idiocy.

“Apropos of nothing I really think if someone quickly deletes a tweet, it shouldn’t be screenshotted and shared like…just let it die, you know? No? No one else agree?” she tweeted following the backlash.

No, Gill. We don’t agree. With any of this, actually. Because, you know, basic decency and all.



 

Join the conversation!

Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!

Hey, Noah here!

Wondering where we went?

Read this and bookmark our new site!

See you over there!

Thanks for sharing!