Newt Gingrich: The 2020 Election May Be The Biggest Presidential Theft Since The 1824 Election

Newt Gingrich has a history lesson for us.

Gingrich went on Twitter and said the 2020 election “may be the biggest Presidential theft since Adams and Clay robbed Andrew Jackson in 1824”.

So what exactly happened in the 1824 election?

Well, long story short Andrew Jackson won the popular vote and had the most electoral votes but being he failed to meet the majority of electoral votes needed to win, so the election was decided by the House of Representatives.

The House of Representatives then voted for John Quincy Adams due to the fact Henry Clay(then-House speaker) persuaded the house to vote for John Quincy Adams.

Many believe Henry Clay reached a side deal (corrupt bargain) with John Quincy Adams due to the fact he became the Secretary of State under John Quincy Adams.

Gingrich is right the 1824 election was corrupt but the corruption in this election is on another level.

The more data comes out on vote anomalies that clearly are not legitimate the more it looks like 2020 may be the biggest Presidential theft since Adams and Clay robbed Andrew Jackson in 1824. State legislatures should demand recounts

— Newt Gingrich (@newtgingrich) November 27, 2020

Every Republican state legislator should read Patrick Basham’s analysis https://t.co/3mUFZtD1Y8 and demand an oversight committee to review their state’s vote. Basham makes clear the election was almost certainly stolen in 5 states. Every Americanm should be worried by the theft.

— Newt Gingrich (@newtgingrich) November 28, 2020

Breitbart News covered Gingrich’s comments had this to add:

Newt Gingrich believes the 2020 election may be the “biggest presidential theft” since 1824 and is urging state legislatures to “demand recounts.”

“The more data comes out on vote anomalies that clearly are not legitimate the more it looks like 2020 may be the biggest Presidential theft since Adams and Clay robbed Andrew Jackson in 1824,” the former House speaker said in a Friday tweet:

On Saturday morning, Gingrich encouraged Republican state legislators to read an analysis from Patrick Basham, founding Director of the Democracy Institute and senior fellow of the Cato Institute. Basham lists ten “peculiarities” which he believes lack “compelling explanations,” including swing states halting their ballot counts on election night and removing observers, statistically abnormal vote counts, and “historically low absentee ballot rejection rates.”

"Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich is an authority on American history. When it comes to the 2020 election, he is convinced that fraud took place and that we as a country, haven’t seen anything like it in almost 100 years." https://t.co/W59yFR9cVR

— David Atherton (@DaveAtherton20) November 29, 2020

The Epoch Times added these details about Gingrich’s statements about election fraud in the 2020 election:

Laziness leads to sloppiness, and sloppiness is how the most brazen heist in American history is being exposed.

Stealing the 2020 election was a mammoth undertaking, involving widespread lawlessness and illicit partnerships between private actors and public officials. They’ve been working to cover their tracks since Election Day, but they didn’t work fast enough. Now, the courts need to stop them from destroying any more evidence so that the people of Pennsylvania—and the rest of the country—can accurately assess the ramifications of their wrongdoing.

Explosive new litigation filed in federal district court on Nov. 21 details and documents a wide variety of illegal practices that were used to inflate the number of votes received by Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden, including disparate treatment of voters based on where they live and outright manipulation of Pennsylvania’s voter registration system by partisan activists.

An unprecedented number of mail-in and absentee ballots were cast this year, and practically everyone expected that this would result in a higher-than-usual rate of ballots being rejected for various flaws, such as lacking a secrecy envelope or missing information.

If you would like more information about the corruption that took place in the 1824 election check out this very informing video below: