Skip to main content
29) { ?>
We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here.

Newt Gingrich Predicts 2020 Will Be A “Disaster” For Democrats, House Will Turn Red


President Trump is widely expected to win in a landslide in the 2020 election and serve 4 more years as our awesome president, but now, Newt Gingrich predicts this will not be the only victory for Republicans come 2020.

According to Mr. Gingrich, we’re gonna see the currently Democrat-dominated House of Representatives go red in 2020!

And we can thank the Dems (or as Gingrich calls them, Democratic-Socialists) for this, with all their witch hunts that the American people are sick and tired of!

Check out what Mr. Gingrich had to predict for 2020 in this tweet:

Gingrich believes that the impeachment efforts on Dems are backfiring, serving only to hurt themselves.

He has also noted that the Democrat party has seemingly transformed into a totally different socialist party altogether:

Folks on Twitter seem to agree with the former Speaker on his 2020 prediction:

Newt Gingrich went into more detail about why he's calling the Democrats the Democratic-Socialist party now, and how they are transforming into an "anti-American engine of radical change" in this Fox News column:

The Democratic-Socialist candidates embrace policies ranging from  wanting to confiscate guns; forcing the radical California gender  curriculum on every state; removing the tax exemption for every church,  synagogue, and mosque that defines marriage as between a man and a  woman; providing free (meaning taxpayer-funded) health care to people  living in our country illegally; and opening the border so anyone and  everyone will be able to enter the United States without having to worry  about immigration laws.

Some of these radical candidates favor  tax-paid sex-change operations in prison – and genderless prisons (one  of Biden’s contributions to the dialogue) so male criminals could  declare themselves female to be sent to women’s prisons.

Imagine  that one of the candidates had said he or she was against abortion. The  result might have been a riot – and at a minimum an expulsion of the  heretic. Instead, the new Democratic-Socialist Party stands for abortion  on the last day of pregnancy, and its most radical acolytes are now for  infanticide after delivery as long as “the infant would be kept comfortable” (see the New York state law endorsed by the Democratic governor of Virginia).

Almost  equally heretical would have been a candidate defending Columbus Day  (favored by 57 percent to 29 percent of the public, with the  Democratic-Socialists once again in a position favored by about a  quarter of the country).

Imagine that candidate attacking the  National Education Association’s pledge that “educators must acknowledge  the existence of White supremacy culture as a primary root cause of  institutional racism, structural racism, and White privilege. ...the  Association will actively advocate for social and educational strategies  fostering the eradication of institutional racism and White privilege  perpetuated by White supremacy culture.”

White supremacy culture  is left-wing code for American history, American exceptionalism, the  rule of law, the Constitution, and the various habits and patterns that  made America the most prosperous and powerful nation in history.

Can  you imagine one of the candidates in the debate arguing that our  schools should not be centers of anti-American indoctrination dictated  by left-wing unions? Of course not. They would be booed off the stage.

As The Wall Street Journal put it in an editorial headlined “Warren and Sanders, Policy Mates.” the pattern is overwhelming:

The  editorial says this about Warren and Sanders: “They both would force  these companies to get a new federal charter requiring them to consider  ‘stakeholders’ rather than shareholders in their business decisions.  They both want to reimpose the old Glass-Steagall fence between  commercial banking and investment banking. 'The business model of Wall  Street is fraud,’ Mr. Sanders likes to say. Ms. Warren also thinks  bankers are crooks: 'Wall Street is looting the economy.’ They agree the  U.S. Postal Service should become a bank that offers government  checking accounts and would compete with private banks.

“On  college as an entitlement, the two again see eye to eye.  'It’s time to  cancel student debt and make universal free college a reality,’ one  says. The other reverses the order: 'We are going to make public  colleges and universities tuition free, and cancel all student debt.’  For the record, Ms. Warren’s plan is the first one.”

There are a  scattered handful of traditional liberal Democrats in the House and  Senate, but none have any chance of ever being a national candidate in  the emerging Democratic-Socialist Party.

We  are watching a historic moment in which a once-great American political  party is transformed into an anti-American engine of radical change. In  2020, every Democratic candidate will be faced with the challenge of  defending a national party that is now the Democratic-Socialist Party.

It  will be a wrenching, defining moment for the party of Presidents  Franklin Delano Roosevelt and John F. Kennedy if it is conquered by the  party of AOC, Sanders and Warren.

He also wrote on Newsweek:

Tuesday night's debate was one more reminder that we are living through the death of the Democratic Party.

It is presently being replaced by the Democratic-Socialist Party. If you think I exaggerate, consider these examples.

Imagine that any candidate last night had had the courage (or lack of sense) to actively defend President Bill Clinton's policies on welfare reform, capital gains tax cuts and balanced federal budgets, or his 1996 State of the Union assertion that "the era of Big Government is over."

Imagine that any candidate had agreed with President Barack Obama's original 2008 position that "I believe marriage is between a man and a woman. I am not in favor of gay marriage." Or imagine that a candidate had defended Obamacare as the solution to health care in America and opposed any limitation on the right to buy private insurance.

When the last two Democratic presidents are no longer defendable, something profound has happened.

We have already seen the old Democratic Party (and Speaker Nancy Pelosi, House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer and House Majority Whip Jim Clyburn literally represent the old Democratic Party) being eclipsed by "the Squad." Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is now the spiritual leader of House Democrats, and every major Democratic presidential candidate has endorsed radical Green New Deal-type proposals that would expand government, destroy the energy industry, radically change America and plunge the economy into a depression.

The Democratic-Socialist Party wants to outlaw private health insurance, punish the successful (especially the wealthy) and expand government control over virtually everything. The Democratic Socialist candidates range from wanting to confiscate guns; to forcing the radical California gender curriculum in every state; to removing the tax exception for every church, synagogue and mosque that defines marriage as between a man and a woman; to providing free (meaning taxpayer-funded) health care to people living in the country illegally; to opening the border so anyone and everyone will be able to enter the United States without having to worry about immigration law.

Mr. Gingrich's prediction for 2020 may not be far of, at all!

At least if the Moody's Election Analytics - which are predicting a Trump lanslide as long as the economy stays as great as it is right now underneath our president - are right, which they have been all but once since 1980!

CNBC has more to say on this:

President Donald Trump looks likely to cruise to reelection next year under three different economic models Moody’s Analytics employed to gauge the 2020 race.

Barring anything unusual happening, the president’s Electoral College victory could easily surpass his 2016 win over Democrat Hillary Clinton, which came by a 304-227 count.

Moody’s based its projections on how consumers feel about their own financial situation, the gains the stock market has achieved during Trump’s tenure and the prospects for unemployment, which has fallen to a 50-year low. Should those variables hold up, the president looks set to get another four-year term.

The modeling has been highly accurate going back to the 1980 election, missing only once.

That said, elections rely on VOTERS!

So, come 2020, make your voice heard and vote for Trump!


29) { ?>


Join the conversation!

Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!

29) { ?>

Hey, Noah here!

Wondering where we went?

Read this and bookmark our new site!

See you over there!

Thanks for sharing!