Skip to main content
We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here.

Obama’s People Are REALLY Trying To Bury The Durham Report


7,751 views

And this is exactly why we need that report!

Former Obama-era DOJ official, Matthew Miller, thinks that we don’t deserve to see the Durham report in its full, uncensored, glory.

Matthew Miller thinks that the Durham report needs to be held back a little—likely for censorship purposes and for fears that, in his own words, would “unfairly tarnish some people at the FBI”…

This idea that the report needs to be submitted to Merrick Garland at the DOJ is a joke, precisely because the Department of Justice has become so partisan and corrupt under this administration.

Garland has previously covered for the Bureau and has gone so far as to go on the offensive against F.B.I. whistleblowers…

The Wall Street Journal writes:

 

Previous predictions have since come to pass with the advent of Miller’s desperate call to delay or censor the findings of the Durham report.

The public deserves to know the truth that the courts could not even scratch.

Conservative Brief quotes Miller:

“It’s different because in that case, the subject of that investigation could not be charged, and so it was appropriate for the department to make its findings public, so Congress could decide whether to impeach and convict the then-sitting president,” he said.

“That is not the case here, so to release a report in this instance — given what we know about the way that Durham has behaved, some of his inappropriate public statements during this investigation, the poor judgments he has made in bringing these charges — to release a report publicly and let him have the final word I think probably unfairly tarnish some people at the FBI that we know he holds ill will to based on some of the things he said in this most recent trial.”

 

Washington Examiner reminds readers:

Garland testified to the Senate last October that “with respect to the report, I would like as much as possible to be made public — I have to be concerned about Privacy Act concerns and classification, but other than that, the commitment is to provide a public report, yes.”

Garland also vowed, “There will be no political or otherwise undue interference with the Durham investigation.”



 

Join the conversation!

Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!

Hey, Noah here!

Wondering where we went?

Read this and bookmark our new site!

See you over there!

Thanks for sharing!