What’s the Real Reason for Mass Vaccination of Millions of Healthy People? What Mainstream Media Won’t Tell You.


69,280 views

It has long been established that the vast majority of the public is at little risk to COVID-19.

COVID-19 survival rates from the CDC itself:

Trending: The Marshall Report Says Trump Is NEVER Going Back To The White House, But Here’s Why….

Yet, we hear over and over from the mainstream media that life doesn’t return to normal without everyone receiving a COVID-19 vaccine.

The elderly, front-line healthcare workers, teachers, and even kids.

It’s just to keep us ‘safe’ and end the pandemic.

Everyone doing their part.

That’s what they’re selling, but are there ulterior motives to pushing these rushed, dangerous vaccines to the public?

Let’s take a deeper look into possible motives you won’t hear from the mainstream press.

Life Site News has the complete breakdown for us:

1.) New mRNA vaccines may change your DNA, permanently

According to Dr. Miklos Lukacs de Pereny, a research professor of science and technology in Peru, the COVID-19 pandemic was manufactured by the world’s elites as part of a plan to globally advance “transhumanism” — literally, the fusion of human beings with technology in an attempt to alter human nature itself.

Several scholars have been raising warning flags about this imminent possibility in respect to the coronavirus vaccines aggressively being rolled-out, particularly the Bill Gates-backed Pfizer and Moderna vaccines.

Dr. Carrie Madej, an internist trained in osteopathic medicine, has expressed her urgent concerns in several videos, and interviews which have gained a strong circulating presence on social media for several months now.

Both of these vaccines use a new “messenger RNA” technology (mRNA), which Madej states is important to know, “because it could potentially alter our DNA, our genome.” And our human genome is what separates us from animals and plants. It is our “blueprint” for how we develop, reproduce, function and repair ourselves. Therefore, “one little change one little protein inserted, one taken out, can actually create a congenital defect or a hereditary disorder.”

This process is called “transfection” and is the “same technology being used to make a genetically modified organism, such as a tomato or corn in the grocery store,” Madej said. Such modified organisms “are not as healthy as the organic the wild type that you see out in nature,” thus, potentially, “we would not be as healthy.”

Dr. Lukacs points out how similar DNA modifying experiments have been performed on human embryos already. Culture-of-death scientists have been “mixing genes with humans from monkeys and rats, with pigs because we want to harvest organs…” and then killing the embryos after 14 days.

The public is told, he says, that with respect to these vaccines, the mRNA “will go into the cell and instruct the DNA to code a particular protein, which will then fight against the virus.”

“But who can certify [for] us that this is the type of RNA they are manufacturing?” he asked. As the vaccine could carry RNA to do just about anything, including limiting “our capacity to capture oxygen in the red (blood) cells,” or disrupt the “physiological process where you have to develop sperm. You never know. The sky is the limit,” he said.

As has long been an ethical concern with human genome research, the virtually limitless possibilities of this technology can be horribly abused. Such processes may be able to even compromise other features, such as one’s intelligence, and that of their offspring, creating even a class of sub-humans by combining human DNA with that of animals.

While vaccine manufacturers have denied that the mRNA in these vaccines will change one’s genome, Dr. Louis Fouché, a French anesthetist and resuscitation specialist said this can’t be known until it happens and we have long-term studies, highlighting another grave concern with such a rushed vaccine. In response to the same assertion, Dr. Madej, adds that with their expression of certainty on this question, these corporations are simply “outright lying.”

Creepy Bill Gates has openly admitted the potential impact of experimental mRNA vaccines.

But it’s being swept under the rug by the mainstream media and big tech companies.

These mRNA vaccines have NEVER been used before.

So, we have no way of knowing the potential long-term or permanent side effects it will cause.

More from Life Site News:

2.) Population control

As a major population control advocate, Bill Gates, the founder of Microsoft as well as the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, has been an enthusiastic supporter of these mRNA vaccines, and has spoken in the past about using vaccines as a means to reduce the world’s population.

Interestingly, in a recent petition to the European Medicines Agency (EMA), Dr. Yeadon, and another physician made the case for suspending all COVID-19 vaccine studies in Europe, citing known risks from previous studies which still remain, including infertility in women.

Since these mRNA vaccinations are expected to produce anti-bodies to attack “spike proteins” such as COVID-19, and “spike proteins also contain syncytin-homologous proteins, which are essential for the formation of the placenta … infertility of indefinite duration could result in vaccinated women,” they warned.

Corroborating this effect, the U.K. government-produced safety instructions for the Pfizer vaccine indicate that it should not be used by pregnant or breast-feeding mothers. In addition, they state that it is unknown what effect the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine will have on fertility. The instructions state, “It is unknown whether COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 has an impact on fertility.”

Thus, the enormous drive for the broad distribution of this vaccine implicitly proposes that it’s sensible for women in their childbearing years to risk permanent sterilization in order to reduce their chances of being infected by a virus with a high (99.8%) survival rate in their age bracket, and for which excellent treatments are available.

Our ole’ buddy Bill Gates again.

He’s long preached the necessity of population control.

And he hasn’t kept secret the use of vaccines to deter population growth.

Moving on to item #3:

3.) ‘Branding’ of all individuals with a digital ID using ‘Luciferase’

Another possible motive behind the COVID-19 vaccine, according to Dr. Madej, is the potential to insert a digital code, barcode or type of personal “brand” under the skin.

Scientific American published an article late last year reporting that Bill Gates had commissioned the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) to build an injectable “quantum dot dye system” to tattoo stored medical information beneath the skin of children, and potentially, adults as well.

This technology, Dr. Madej tells us, is called “Luciferase,” supposedly because this enzyme “gives a bioluminescence, a light” when activated. It is not seen or felt by the host, but with a device “like a smart phone with a special app,” one can scan over that section of the skin and it will light up passing to the device a digital code, pattern, barcode and thus an ID of some kind.

With this technology, she states, “you now become like a product,” that is “branded,” or one might add, like a farm animal whose marking identifies its owner and permits them to better track the location of their property.

The reported development purpose of this technology was to provide clear assurance of vaccination for children in the “developing world” where “paperwork gets lost, and parents forget whether their child is up to date.”

According to Dr. Madej, this technology allows authorities to have absolute verification that a particular person has been vaccinated successfully, and has thus undergone “a successful gene modification,” as these designers don’t trust medical records, nor certainly the testimony of the individual.

Digitally branding those who take the vaccine?

And the name Luciferase?

Sounds like some mark of the beast type stuff right there.

Even Democrat presidential candidate Andrew Yang flouted the idea of marking vaccine takers with a bar code.

And finally:

4.) Constant surveillance and technological manipulation using ‘Hydrogel’ and AI

The insertion of a different new technology under the skin, may be an additional motivation for the COVID-19 vaccine. “Hydrogel” a nanotechnology, which Madej describes as “microscopic robotic organisms,” was developed by the U.S. Defense of Advanced Research Project Agency (DARPA), and a private corporation called Profusa.

One primary function of this technology is to gather information from the host’s body, including blood pressure, blood sugar, heart rate, medications, nutrients, etc. However, Madej says, “it has the potential to be used for other things” as well, such as documenting how many steps one takes, if a person is swimming, running, sleeping, menstruating, and potentially, even one’s emotions.

This data is constantly measured by the individual’s smart device, sent to the cloud, and to some other data base, or as she describes it, an “artificial intelligence” (AI).

“Think about how immediately that could change our privacy … our autonomy, and our freedoms,” Madej implores. “And all of this information is going where? Who is protecting this information? What are they using it for?”

In a video presentation sponsored by Children’s Health Defense (CHD), Dr. Liz Mumper, a pediatrician, president of a Lynchburg, VA medical center, and a member of the CHD Scientific Advisory Committee, provides a nine-point criteria for verifying that a COVID-19 vaccine is safe.

Her eighth criterion states “Vaccines should be free of Radio-Frequency ID (RFID) bio-chips and nano-technology agents.” 

“The introduction of bio-chips and nano-technology agents by vaccine is a new frontier being explored by tech companies and military research agencies” such as DARPA, she writes.  This technology is expected to “create a communications interface between a person’s biology / physiology / psychology and outside technologies. No one knows the short or long-term effects.”

Dr. Mumper also cites a news story titled, “FDA Nears Approval of Injectable Biochip Implants for COVID Detection, Linked to Computers,” and states its “imperative that we make thoughtful choices about the interface between humanity and technology, and make informed risk-versus-benefit decisions.”

As a safeguard, her criteria include the necessity of independent testing to verify that no such technologies are present in the vaccine, while warning that “It is highly unlikely that these agents would be listed on the vaccine insert under ‘ingredients.’”

Noting that CHD is very concerned about the possibility of this infringement, she also clarifies, “I’m not saying this will be done with COVID vaccines … but we need to have our eyes wide open,” with regard to this possibility.

In addition, Dr. Madej warned that such technology is a two-way street, and as information is sent out from these devices in the body, they should be able to receive data as well, affecting individuals in some way. “Would it affect our mood, our behavior … how we think, or our memories?” Might it allow outside parties to exert an internal technological influence upon our dispositions?

Related to this merging of human biology with AI, Dr. Lukacs warned how this has been part of the goals for the World Economic Forum’s Klaus Schwab for some time. The German founder of this organization has been using the coronavirus pandemic as a pretense to advance what he refers to as “the Fourth Industrial Revolution,” which he described as “a fusion of technologies that is blurring the lines among the physical, digital and biological spheres.” This “revolution,” Schwab pledged in January 2016, “will affect the very essence of our human experience.”

In this age of censorship, don’t expect to hear any of these possible motives in the mainstream media.

There’s big money to be made and the ultimate control & surveillance of humanity.

And when you follow that money trail, it all makes sense with the heavy players involved.

World Health Organization.

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

National Institute of Health.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

And all this for a virus that most people have over a 99% chance of survival?

The evidence doesn’t warrant forced vaccinations.

NATIONAL POLL: Do You Support Trump Declaring ANTIFA a Terrorist Organization?

Microbiologist and author Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi even stated in an interview with Laura Ingraham that the push for the COVID vaccine is downright dangerous and you would go to your doom.

 



Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!
Thanks for sharing!
Send this to a friend